- Submission
Authors submit their manuscript through the designated submission through the Conference Management Portal. Submissions must adhere to the conference's formatting and content guidelines.
- Initial Editorial Screening
The editorial team conducts a preliminary review to check for:
- Adherence to submission guidelines
- Relevance to the conference theme
- Basic quality and completeness
Manuscripts that pass this screening are forwarded for peer review.
- Double-Blind Peer Review
Each manuscript is sent to two independent reviewers, maintaining a double-blind process to ensure impartiality:
- Reviewer Selection : Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject area of the manuscript nationally and internationally
- Anonymity : Reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and vice versa
- Review Criteria
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:
- Originality and significance of the research
- Methodological soundness
- Clarity and coherence of writing
- Relevance to the field or topic
- Contribution to the body of knowledge
- Reviewer Feedback
Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations, which could be:
- Accept (as is or with minor revisions)
- Major Revisions Required (requiring significant changes and resubmission)
- Reject (unsuitable for publication)
- Consolidation of Reviews
The editor synthesizes the reviewers' feedback and communicates the decision to the author(s). If reviews conflict significantly, a third reviewer may be consulted
- Revisions and Resubmission
- Authors address reviewers' comments and resubmit the revised manuscript.
- Revisions are sent back to the reviewers (if required) for re-evaluation.
- Final Decision
The editorial board makes the final decision based on reviewer recommendations and revisions. The possible outcomes include:
- Acceptance
- Request for further revisions
- Rejection
- Post-Acceptance
Accepted manuscripts undergo final copyediting, proofreading, and formatting before publication
